Expected cutoff marks for ugc net june 2012

[Rajib Roy]

Category	Qualifying Cut-off Marks for  in Eligibility for Lectureship UGC-NET held on JUNE 2012
	Paper-I	Paper-II	Paper-I + Paper-II	Paper-III	Paper-I + Paper-II + Paper-III
GEN	40 (40%)	40 (40%)	100 (50%)	82-84 (55%)	206-210(60%)
OBC(NCL)	35 (35%)	35 (35%)	90(45%)	74-76 (50%)	188-192(55%)
SC/ST/PH/VH	35 (35%)	35 (35%)	80(40%)	66-68 (45%)	174-178 (50%)

 

 

 

 

Category	Qualifying Cut-off Marks for  in Eligibility for JRF  UGC-NET held on JUNE 2012
	Paper-I	Paper-II	Paper-I + Paper-II	Paper-III	Paper-I + Paper-II + Paper-III
GEN	60 (60%)	60 (60%)	120 (60%)	245 (70%)
OBC(NCL)	55 (55%)	55 (55%)	110(55%)	228 (65%)
SC/ST/PH/VH	55 (55%)	55 (55%)	100(50%)	210 (60%)

[Rajashekhar M Patil]

Dear Colleagues,

 Please Dont Create Confusion by telling Cut Off Marks and all ok

 what and all you people are thinking know about these Cut Marks and all,

UGC cant change any rule as and when they want ok.

They are clearly mentioned in the June 2012 Notification rule and regulation.

same thing they have to follow as it is for this June Exam  ..!!!  

They cant change any New Rules for this June 2012 EXAM.

if they want to change any criteria, they can change for upcoming  DEC 2012 EXAM.

Hence i request to all those who have got Eligible Marks in June 2012 Exam,

Be Calm and wait for your final Result. 

Please don't think too about any NET Cut Off Marks all.

Thanking You,

Rajashekhar M Patil

[Arijit Bhattacharyya]

result kab niklega? kisi ko pata hai kya?

[federalstate50]

why u r not properly calculation how can u say 110 and 120 to be of 50% and 60% when paper was out of 150 and in final 245 and 228 u have calculated out of 350 in the jrf cut off section

[Shailendra Rana]

In NET-June 2012,Third paper was of 150 marks not 200.... so 110 marks in paper-III means 73% not 55% & 100 marks means 66% not 50% 

[Shailendra Rana]

It is very sad & shameful that such people who even can't calculate the percentage correctly are in teaching in our country....

[federalstate50]

Mr. Dumb when u don't know the situation do not comment on calculation, that guy was referring to the old paper when it used to be out of 200, in the very cut 0ff marks itself has too many faults and has created all sorts of confusion., i should say you dont understand ugc net cut off marks nor you have able to solve what is given as cut off marks, over all u r a dumb and trying to be over smart though u dont know anything so keep ur suggestion with yourself only