LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

papanna s Abi Dore replied to Velmurugan.C's discussion Librarian Designation-Sending Feedback to UGC-reg
1 hour ago
Millan Krushna Dutta updated their profile
2 hours ago
Reshma Rana joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
2 hours ago
Reshma Rana updated their profile
2 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted an event
19 hours ago
Ravi. posted a blog post
19 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
19 hours ago
Velmurugan.C replied to Velmurugan.C's discussion Librarian Designation-Sending Feedback to UGC-reg
20 hours ago
Profile IconMADHAVI KANNAM, MANJULA, KOKATE JOTIRAM AUDUMBER and 2 more joined LIS Links
23 hours ago
Dr MANIKANDAN T updated their profile
yesterday
papanna s Abi Dore replied to Velmurugan.C's discussion Librarian Designation-Sending Feedback to UGC-reg
yesterday
Dr.Stephen.G posted blog posts
yesterday
papanna s Abi Dore replied to Velmurugan.C's discussion Librarian Designation-Sending Feedback to UGC-reg
yesterday
Surendra Singh left a comment for Ashwani Kumar
yesterday
Rohit Jangra updated their profile
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G posted discussions
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G posted blog posts
Tuesday
Gurmeet Singh posted an event
Monday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted an event
Thumbnail

International Data Week 2025: Benefits and Opportunities – A Webinar at Online

February 25, 2025 from 10:30am to 11:30am
Monday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Monday

NET: court declines stay Source The Hindu 23-01-2012

NET: court declines  stay

K0CHI:  A Division Bench  of the Kerala  High Court on Tues-day declined to  stay a single

judge's  order  quashing  the University  Grants  Commission's  (UGC)'s  new  eligibility

criteria  for  the  National Eligibility  Test.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K, Vinod Chandran posted an appeal

filed by the UGC to February 5 For Final Hearing

The  Single  Judge  had also directed the UGC to grant certificates to candidates who had obtained the minimum mark  prescribed  earlier

UGC's contention

The UGC contended that the court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of a test. The original notification had clearly' stated that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately.It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and
eligibility for Lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results

It was a moderation committee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior academicians that had

rec-commended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper vise minimum Percentage as qualifying criteria the  UGC said.

Within powers
The appeal said that in order to maintain high standard in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of UGC. Prescribing the Qualifying criteria by fixing an aggregate percentage could not be called change of rules in the middle of the test\. No new criterion was introduced by UGC



Views: 3037

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

but what guarantee final hearing will be on 5th fab. ek baar postponed hota hai toh postponed hamesha hote rehta hai. allah jaane kya hoga?

Tareekh pe tareekh milti rahi hai lekin insaaf nahin milta. Milti hai to sirf tareekh. Kanoon ke dalalon ne tareekh ko ek hathiyar ki tarah istemaal kiya hai - a dialogue from hindi film and comment on indian judicial system.

I must say that never loose hopes. Hum honge kamyaab ek din, man main hai vishwas pur ahai vishwaas hum honge kaamyab ek din.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop