Why Petition against UGC

[Apurba Jyoti Majumder]

Recently,

I have seen several posts regarding filing petition against UGC in courts.

I think candidates are enthusiastic by Kerala high court verdict.

But, wait.

The game is not over yet..

UGC decision is yet to come.

Its a statutary body.

Dear friends, what do you think about the situation,

if there is 1 Lakh NET qualified candidate per session June & December?

.

All of you are demanding reduction of qualifying marks.

after that for 1 post 1000 candidate will apply.

In objective mode without negative marking, its not a big deal to score 40+40+75 (UR) and less for Quota candidates.

If your luck favours, U may score easily.

I am just asking 1 question.

How many of you can challenge me that "I HAVE ANSWERED ALL THE QUESTIONS CONFIDENTLY. I WAS 100% SURE ABOUT THE OPTION I HAVE CHOSEN"

 

I can bet that if UGC re-examine the answer script with negative marking, the result count will come to 30%

[balaram mandal]

 Self criticism is good.But here the issue is totally different!! Now at this point of time there should not be any question of who can score what? That means you feel the total  process was faulty!

 

"As you sow you reap " is an old proverb.

As UGC has sown it has to reap.Even if 100% of the candidates appearing for NET passess!!!

Fowl play is not tolerable...

[Apurba Jyoti Majumder]

Its not self criticism.
do you think I am asking the question to myself?

.

You just answer my question / challenge 

[balaram mandal]

My point is what UGC had declared about the criteria set by UGC for conducting NET JUNE2012,i.e no negative marking and minimum qualifying marks before holding the examination must have adhered to it honestly.A decision to take an examination depends on some criterias.Those who take an exam must think clearly about the rules.

I am not saying you are criticising yourself.You are asking us to criticise ourselves befor a claim to UGC.

We have just followed the rules.

[Dr. N K Pachauri]

Yes you are 100% right Apurba sir

I agree

[zaidy]

T think Apurba is right because the UGC is down the NET standard, i am knowing some friend  who are not    capable to  discussing  in  his subject but now he is NET qualifier. who is responsible whole scenario of this.

i think in this time NET is so easy but PhD in LIS is difficult and thank UGC for preventing the PhD through correspondence.

[Naurin Ashraf]

Good Point Mr. Pusaparaj Naik

[Naurin Ashraf]

Mr. Majumder or  Whatever your name is, perhaps you are not aware of the so many technical mistakes done by UGC in NET June 2012 exam and even I'm not going to discuss it with you. Your NET would be clear that's why you are talking like this. We are fighting for our career. So please it is requested to you that if you can not support us then also don't demoralize by sending such messages.

Regards

Naurin Ashraf

[Apurba Jyoti Majumder]

Dear Ms. Naurin Ashraf

First of all kindly try to respect the fellow professionals.

My name is clearly written in my profile.

So, I dont think you should have any problem in reading that.

so, the term " WHATEVER' is not applicable here.

I am not demoralizing you.

Dnt think that As I have cleared NET, so I have no sympathy for the upcoming professional

But the way You are demanding the degree, is just can not be accepted

I am just in favour of the quality.

regarding the point raised by Mr. Pusaparaj Naik.

Its a policy matter of Govt of India for SC/ST/OBC.

why dont you just compare the marks of a non qualified UR with a NET qualified OBC student?

[Dr.L.M.Khan]

Mr. Majumdar 

You don't know the facts and you are not justice and judges are well qualified. Please not post this type of comment here.  Its a fight of between student and ugc. 

[Apurba Jyoti Majumder]

I want some expert comments from Ms Naurin Ashraf

I am waiting madam..........

[Apurba Jyoti Majumder]

Good News

[Ravi Ajagekar]

No need to file writ petition. Bc.... 

 

SC relief to NET candidates

TNN | Dec 24, 2012, 04.19 AM IST

PUNE: In a relief to thousands of aspirants taking the national eligibility test (NET), the UGC has withdrawn its decision to increase the cut-off marks for clearing the NET, following a Supreme Court order on Friday. The UGC had increased the eligibility score by 15% without notice.

The national educational testing bureau of the UGC conducts the NET for determining the eligibility for lectureship and for awarding junior research fellowship to ensure minimum standards for the entrants in the teaching profession and research. The NET is conducted in June and December every year.

The UGC, however, made several changes in the June 2012 exam, including increasing the cut-off marks. The candidates learnt about the changes only when the UGC announced it a day after announcing the results of the exam on September 18.

As per the initial notification, candidates belonging to the SC/ST sections needed 35, 35, and 60 marks respectively for qualifying papers 1, 2 and 3. The marks to be obtained by the OBCs were set as 35, 35, and 68 and for those belonging to the general category it was 40, 40, and 75. But, when the results were announced, candidates who would've been eligible as per the initial criteria failed to qualify.

As per the new criteria, the percentage of marks to be scored by candidates belonging to different categories has been increased by 15%.

This made several students file an affidavit with the SC against the UGC regarding change in norms. On Friday, the SC issued an order saying that the UGC's decision was invalid as it did not follow the exam policy in announcing the changes in cut-offs and that, too, in such a short period of time. An official at the University of Pune that conducts the NET exam said, "The SC decision is valid for all candidates who sat for the June 2012 examinations. The old cut-offs will be considered and new results will be announced."

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/entrance-exams/SC...

No need to file writ petition. Bc.... 

 

SC relief to NET candidates

TNN | Dec 24, 2012, 04.19 AM IST

PUNE: In a relief to thousands of aspirants taking the national eligibility test (NET), the UGC has withdrawn its decision to increase the cut-off marks for clearing the NET, following a Supreme Court order on Friday. The UGC had increased the eligibility score by 15% without notice.

The national educational testing bureau of the UGC conducts the NET for determining the eligibility for lectureship and for awarding junior research fellowship to ensure minimum standards for the entrants in the teaching profession and research. The NET is conducted in June and December every year.

The UGC, however, made several changes in the June 2012 exam, including increasing the cut-off marks. The candidates learnt about the changes only when the UGC announced it a day after announcing the results of the exam on September 18.

As per the initial notification, candidates belonging to the SC/ST sections needed 35, 35, and 60 marks respectively for qualifying papers 1, 2 and 3. The marks to be obtained by the OBCs were set as 35, 35, and 68 and for those belonging to the general category it was 40, 40, and 75. But, when the results were announced, candidates who would've been eligible as per the initial criteria failed to qualify.

As per the new criteria, the percentage of marks to be scored by candidates belonging to different categories has been increased by 15%.

This made several students file an affidavit with the SC against the UGC regarding change in norms. On Friday, the SC issued an order saying that the UGC's decision was invalid as it did not follow the exam policy in announcing the changes in cut-offs and that, too, in such a short period of time. An official at the University of Pune that conducts the NET exam said, "The SC decision is valid for all candidates who sat for the June 2012 examinations. The old cut-offs will be considered and new results will be announced."

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/entrance-exams/SC...