LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Hima Bindu updated their profile
Tuesday
Sumit Chakraborty updated their profile
Tuesday
Vijay Singh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Sunday
Vijay Singh posted a status
"5 Days National Workshop on Koha ILMS Organized by Sikkim Akademi. For more information visit: https://sikkimakademikoha.in/"
Sunday
Vijay Singh updated their profile
Sunday
Ismail Aw-Abdi posted a status
"If you can measure you can manage"
May 15
Ismail Aw-Abdi updated their profile
May 15
ANKITA GUPTA is now friends with k̶u̶m̶a̶r ѕαηנαу and Dr. Vipul Banker
May 15
Ayan Majumder updated their profile
May 15
Md Sohail updated their profile
May 15
Azmit Begum Chowdhary is attending Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event

International Conference on “Innovative and Digital Transformation in Academic Libraries” (ICIDTAL) at The Dr. O. P. Bhalla Central Library, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad,

May 27, 2025 at 8am to May 28, 2025 at 5pm
May 14
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Ganeshe Nilesh are now friends
May 12
Rajesh Kumar.K updated their profile
May 12
S RAVI posted a status
May 10
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
May 9
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted a discussion
May 9
BHAGWANT PATIL updated their profile
May 7
Dr.K.Nagaraju left a comment for sreelatha Nagari
May 7
socrates updated their profile
May 5
S RAVI posted a status
"Call for Book Chapter “Restructuring and Reimagining Academic Libraries in the Age of AI: Challenges and Opportunities”"
May 4

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 354

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop