How to start writing a article

[Mr.Pradip Nikam]

How to start to writing the artilce.

[Mrs.K Kavita Rao]

More intelligent reading,observation,research aptitude,hold over language,maintaining the flow of thought,critical thinking,research bent of mind are the traits needed to be inculcated and practised to be a good academic writer.
There are many sites giving you excellent tips and advice with illustrations in detail on how to write a research article .Few of them i have listed a few sites below.You can get more through search engines..
1) http://www.experiment-resources.com/tips-on-article-writing.html
2)http://www-distance.syr.edu/writingtips.html
3)http://ezinearticles.com/?Research-Article-Writing---5-Excellent-Re...
4) http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/16/3/191
5)http://dbem.ws/WritingArticle.pdf
6)http://www.isitebuild.com/article-writing.html
7)http://www.academictips.org/acad/atipsforwritingresearchpaper.html

[Vijay Kumar Verma]

For writing an article first of all find out your area of interest. After that try to get the maximum knowledge (to the point ) about that from different sources like books, journals, blogs, interaction with colleagues etc. Make a rough draft of the points which you want to cover. Put data under each section. Review it and then send it for peer review.

[MRS.PRITEE CHAK]

thanks vijay,really this is important piece of information kindly provide more information on peer review,waiting for response

[Vijay Kumar Verma]

When we make the draft of the article for the publication, then we send it to the body where it is to be published or presented. They have a team of expert to review it and add/delete the relevant matter. Recently I had sent a paper at University of Texas for ETD conference 2010. It was peer reviewed by the experts and they made their comments regarding the areas at which I should focus more.

Peer review is the process of subjecting author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform impartial review.

Pragmatically, peer review refers to the work done during the screening of submitted manuscripts This process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and prevents the dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. Publications that have not undergone peer review are likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals.


MRS.PRITEE CHAK said:

thanks vijay,really this is important piece of information kindly provide more information on peer review,waiting for response

[Mr.Pradip Nikam]

Thanks for valuable suggestion

[MRS.PRITEE CHAK]

Thank friend for your quick and positive response,can iget the paper which you have submitted for conference, basically i want to work in area of knowledge Management , if you can help me out., ihave just start... thanks again

Vijay Kumar Verma said:

When we make the draft of the article for the publication, then we send it to the body where it is to be published or presented. They have a team of expert to review it and add/delete the relevant matter. Recently I had sent a paper at University of Texas for ETD conference 2010. It was peer reviewed by the experts and they made their comments regarding the areas at which I should focus more.

Peer review is the process of subjecting author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform impartial review.

Pragmatically, peer review refers to the work done during the screening of submitted manuscripts This process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and prevents the dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. Publications that have not undergone peer review are likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals.


MRS.PRITEE CHAK said:

thanks vijay,really this is important piece of information kindly provide more information on peer review,waiting for response