UGC Chairman, I have written a Strong Mail

[PROSENJIT DEY]

Sir,

Here is an appeal to you from Lislink forum/ student community to reconsider the result of Net June '12 as we have seen many anomally in the process and criteria of publishing the Net result which does not match the prescribed criteria ...Sir,We want your intervention to stop these types of anomaly so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive, rude, biased society.

Faults are as follows:-

 

The criteria fixed by ugc in supplementary result is wrong .The change only for the general category students butOBC and SC/ST category students did not get the benefits of this criteria .I share the information to my lawyer .ugc again n trap.The suplimentry result criteria against obc and sc /st category and Ugc violats the rule of equality.If ugc delete wrong/unevaluated questions then same effect/change comes in other category also.

In Library and information science cut off june 2012 was General :63.43 % OBC : 60% SC/ST :55%

How its possible the reduction in percentage of marks only for general category...???

Same questions but different marks awarded ????? ugc check the quantity only; not quality .

In some other subjects the general category have 65 % but in other categories a reduction in percentage of marks. Mathili (Sub Code: 18) ---------------------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 % Women Studies (Sub Code: 74)--------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 52.57 % Prakrit (Sub Code: 91)---------------------- General: 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 %

Library and information science June 2012 cut off

General 63.43 % Qualified 504

OBC 60% Qualified 352

PWD 55% Qualified 18

SC/ST 55% Qualified 294

There is a lot of dough about to create such type of ((subject wise & category wise)) criteria combining all three papers. like mass communication & journalism, (Sub Code 63)

Gen. Category. 45.71%

OBC Category. 45.14%

Sub Code 89 (Envi. Sc.)

Gen Cat. 56.57%

OBC Cat. 54.06%

PWD Cat. 52.57%

SC/ST Cat. 52%, and so on in all subjects have their own different Cut Off Subject Wise & Category Wise. Please you may check also above Slides provided by Jomy Jose after getting from UGC under RTI Act 2005.

In the first Result the cut off was:

GEN. 65%

OBC. 60%

SC/ST/PWD. 55%

the above cut off was common for all Subjects & Categories given above.

But for Supplementary Result:

the UGC prepared Subject Wise & Category Wise Criteria in a different way ??????? think and rethink again and again on this issue and be active....................

After declaration of revised results we should lodge the case on UGC of time wasting / money wasting / mentally harassment case.

Sir, We want your intervention to stop this type of anomally so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive society. Thanking you.

Faithfully

Prosenjit Dey

[nijoy Kumar Paul]

yes ,very good.It is o.k

[nijoy Kumar Paul]

For reserved category result of library science is not given in supplementary result and UGC have violated the rules of equality and they have given result only for general category up to 63.49 percent.

[Ravikrishnan D]

Dear LIS friends...

What is the real fact of the UGC NET june 2012?

Please give correct information or discontinue these discussions