LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
6 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
6 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
6 hours ago
Ku. Dipti Lodwal is now friends with Vikash Ranjan, Rajkumar das, Vikrant and 2
11 hours ago
Dr. Manoj Das updated their profile
11 hours ago
Srikanth H G updated their profile
12 hours ago
Anil Kumar Jharotia posted a discussion
14 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Thursday
naheem posted a discussion
Thursday
istayaque ahmad posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Hima Bindu are now friends
Thursday
sekhar Gudimetla and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Wednesday
sekhar Gudimetla commented on sekhar Gudimetla's album
Wednesday
istayaque ahmad updated their profile
Apr 14
S RAVI posted a status
"Hi library professionals, How to create the PRISMA flow diagram in systematic review. kindly share the link......."
Apr 12
S RAVI posted a status
"hi friends I need OA SPSS package tools. please share links."
Apr 12

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Facebook

Views: 856

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop