LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Profile IconAnshul kumar, HARSH, Sheela Narayan and 2 more joined LIS Links
59 minutes ago
Reena Tomar and S. Jaffer Basha are now friends
2 hours ago
Sheela Narayan posted a status
"When kvs form 2025 will come for the permanent post of librarian"
16 hours ago
Dr. B.K. Dalai updated their profile
19 hours ago
Profile IconDr. Badan Barman, Kankana B Badan, Munesh Kumar and 7 more were featured
20 hours ago
VARUN KUMAR updated their profile
21 hours ago
AMRUTA RAVIKIRAN SHINDE updated their profile
23 hours ago
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted blog posts
Tuesday
SATYAM PRAKASH TRIPATHI posted a blog post
Tuesday
Rohit Jangra posted a blog post
Tuesday
Suresh Kumar Dubey posted a blog post
Tuesday
Narender Kumar posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconManjula, Chandan Mishra, Dr. B. Mini Devi and 10 more joined LIS Links
Tuesday
S. S. Waghmode posted an event
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted events
Tuesday
Dr.K.S.SHIVRAJ posted an event
Tuesday
Dr. U. Pramanathan posted discussions
Tuesday
Velmurugan.C posted a discussion
Tuesday
Dimple posted a discussion
Tuesday
amreentaj posted a discussion
Tuesday

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Views: 820

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop